Gay Marriage News Round-Up
BOSTON -- Half of Americans disapprove of same-sex marriages and do not want their states to recognize gay marriages from Massachusetts, a new survey by the Boston Globe shows.
The poll released Sunday found that 50 percent of Americans disapprove of gay and lesbian marriages, while 37 percent approve and 11 percent are neutral.
The poll also found that half of Americans believe gay marriages from Massachusetts, where same-sex marriages are legal, should not be recognized in their state. Forty-six percent said they should be recognized.
The poll of 760 randomly selected adults was conducted May 4-9 by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percent.
That may seem grim, but remember that the disapprove's were over 60% just a year ago. These numbers are actually good, they show that people are getting the message about gay marriage not being a bad thing.
Gay Former Congressman Marries in Mass.
BOSTON May 15, 2005 — Former U.S. Rep. Gerry Studds, the first openly gay member of Congress, quietly married his longtime partner last year after same-sex marriage became legal in Massachusetts, according to a published report.
Studds, a liberal Democrat who spent more than 20 years in Congress, married Dean Hara in Boston on May 24, the Patriot Ledger of Quincy reported Sunday.
Mass. Democrats endorse gay marriage
LOWELL -- Moments after state Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly urged his fellow Democrats to broaden their appeal beyond their liberal base, delegates to Massachusetts Democratic Party yesterday voted overwhelmingly to endorse gay marriage in their platform.
Reilly, one of three likely gubernatorial candidates to address the convention, told the crowd of more than 2,500 delegates that it was crucial to win back moderate suburban voters who have helped elect Republican governors over the last 15 years.
''We have to convince ordinary people that we understand what's going on in their lives," Reilly said, ''and that we can help make their lives better."
Reilly did not mention gay marriage in his speech and refused in an interview afterward to say whether he supported the platform change. He has said recently that he now supports gay marriage, after he indicated last year that he preferred permitting gay and lesbian couples to join in civil unions rather than full-fledged marriage.
Opponents launch campaign against civil union bill
Two Republican state senators who are sponsoring civil union legislation in Oregon are under fire from anti-gay rights groups and conservative activists.
Sen. Ben Westlund, R-Tumalo, and Sen. Frank Morse, R-Albany, are co-sponsors of Senate Bill 1000, which would allow civil unions for same-sex couples and outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The bill also has two Democratic sponsors: Sen. Alan Bates of Ashland; and Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown of Portland.
The Oregon Family Council, which was instrumental in the successful Measure 36 campaign that outlawed gay marriage, has sent postcards critical of both senators to voters in their districts.
And the executive board of the Deschutes County Republican Central Committee wants Westlund to explain his support of a measure that board members unanimously oppose.
"We're very disappointed in him," said Richard Morehead, the local party chairman.
Westlund said he's disappointed about a flip-flop by leading supporters of Measure 36.
"In the campaign by the proponents of Measure 36, it was very clear that civil unions were OK," he said. "But now that 36 has passed, all of a sudden they're not."
As anyone who’s been reading my blog for a while will know, I’ve been predicting this. This is one time that I’m not happy about being proven right.
No, the religious elite, having won their battle over gay marriage (For the most part) isn’t even pretending to be tolerant anymore. The fact is, they hate us and want to destroy us.
Judge strikes down Nebraska gay marriage ban
And because I always like to end things on a high note...
WASHINGTON - In the first time that a federal judge has struck down a state constitutional provision limiting marriage to heterosexual couples, U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon on Thursday declared void a provision of the Nebraska constitution that defined marriage as only between a man and a woman and that banned same-sex civil unions, domestic partnerships and other similar relationships.
Bataillon declared in his ruling that under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Nebraska cannot ban same-sex marriages and civil unions.
The ruling may call into question similar provisions in other states’ constitutions.
Nebraska voters enacted the provision five years ago, with 70 percent approving it.
Will rekindle debate in Congress
The ruling is sure to rekindle debate in Congress over judicial power and may re-energize the forces backing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to limit marriage to man-woman couples.
Frankly, I could care less about this rekindling the debate in congress. You just know that the Fundies are going to appeal this, and that means that this is essentially fast tracking this case to the Supreme Court. That is a very big deal indeed.
--Scott J Grunewald

